The Globe and Mail’s Doug Saunders recently published an extensive article that reviews various issues with the Canadian immigration system. Alastair Clarke was interviewed by Doug Saunders for this article and the article highlights past cases, commentary and provides a few solutions. We agree there are many issues within our system, too many to cover in one article; however, we applaud Mr Saunders’ work to identify certain issues and provide potential solutions. We need sound solutions and, perhaps, the entire system warrants a complete overhaul with a focus on modernization.
Mr Saunders is the International Affairs Columnist for the G&M and his piece includes sound recommendations to reform and update the Canadian immigration system. The article refers to a few problematic cases that identified problems in the system. Here is the summary of solutions which are recommended by Mr Saunders:

The solutions: Simplify the system with provinces at the centre. Create a single front door. Remove incentives to come to the border. Fill immigration needs using existing Canadian residents
Please read the article for details. Mr Saunders’ piece is extensive and detailed.
Provincial Needs
During my interview with Mr Saunders, we discussed the potential solutions above. Regarding the first point, we agree 100% with a renewed focus on provincial needs. We have always supported an immigration system that recognizes the variances between the different regions in Canada. The severe housing crisis in Toronto is not a big deal in Winnipeg. You likely hear about the housing crisis across Canada. That is simply not the case. There may be a crisis in Toronto and Vancouver. The recent legislation to ban certain foreign buyers of property in Canada was directed at those large markets; however, it is a law with national scope and it affects other markets that do not have to deal with this issue.
This point is acute given our situation in Manitoba. MPNP was the first (and best!) provincial nominee program. It was designed based on our unique situation. Alastair Clarke is regularly in contact with MPNP Officers. He met with Malaya Marcelino, Minister of Labour and Immigration in Manitoba to review the needs for the program in 2025. She correctly made the request to IRCC for 12,000 Nomination Certificates. After that request, IRCC decided to allocate only 4,750 certificates to the provinces – far below the number requested by Minister Marcelino.
Clearly, there is a disconnect between the decisions made by IRCC in Ottawa and the actual needs of the various provinces and communities.
Collaborative Approach
This was not identified specifically by Mr Saunders; however, it has been a potential solution that has been offered by other experts. For years, Alastair Clarke has been calling for IRCC to implement a “collaborative” approach. Mr Sauders highlighted this approach in the Globe and Mail article:
Canada’s main points-based stream for high-skill families, ironically known as Express Entry, has become a complex and lengthy ordeal that all but mandates would-be immigrant families to pay large sums to a lawyer and be prepared to submit and resubmit voluminous documents, repeatedly switch between programs and pathways, and await results of monthly lotteries often stretching out for years. Currently, Express Entry has a backlog of almost half a million family applications.
“I think immigration should be a more collaborative process,” says Alastair Clarke, who was the Warkentin’s Winnipeg-based lawyer. “Far too often when an officer receives an application that has some small thing missing, instead of talking to the applicant, instead they’ll either return it or refuse the application. It would be much more efficient if they could just resolve issues in a much more informal process.”
As a consequence of this, people who ought to be permanent-resident immigration applicants are choosing instead to come to Canada through quicker pathways: As college or university students, as temporary workers, as refugees or through an astonishing range of specialized programs targeting specific work areas (such as domestic workers or home builders).
Indeed, Alastair Clarke’s comments above were reiterated during his testimony to Parliament (CIMM Committee) in 2020. Here is an excerpt from that testimony:
My last point relates to a collaborative approach.
Part of the reason I was attracted to this area of law is that it is generally non-confrontational. To deal with minor issues, I can easily call a CMO at the IRB, a Superintendent at a POE, an inland enforcement officer or a lawyer at the DOJ. Dealing with IRCC, by contrast, is a constant struggle. When an IRCC Officer makes a clear mistake, there is no easy mechanism to get it fixed. In my view, the Request for Reconsideration system is broken and MPs are far too often put in the difficult position to act intermediaries. Bad decisions by Visa Officers are often easy to appeal to Federal Court but judicial reviews expend a huge amount of time and resources for both the applicants and the government.
Alastair Clarke’s comments from 2020 were relevant then and they are even more relevant today. From our point of view, we are on the same side. We are all fighting to build Canada and to build our communities.
Create a Single Front Door
This is one of Mr Saunders’ suggestions. Over the years, IRCC has been moving in this direction. We used to have to deal with 19 different portals. They have been trying to steamline the online system to make it easier. This is a work in process and we believe that IRCC has been trying to implement a simpler system that includes a “single front door” to Canada’s immigration system.
Remove Incentives to Come to the Border
Mr Saunders identifies many issues at the border:
There has to be a sensible Canadian space between Trumpist mass deportations and closed borders on one hand, and on the other the current reality of a set of policies and institutions that make Canadian governments unable to control who enters the country.
He recognizes that this solution would require “systemwide reforms”. Alastair Clarke is in regular contact with CBSA Officers at various border points (POEs). These Officers have described the difficulties in their positions to regulate the flow of people who are fleeing the USA. In addition, there is an increase in the number of people who enter Canada and then head south to the USA.
In 2022, the tragic case of the Indian family who perished during their journey to the USA was covered by CityNews. The 2 agent smugglers were convicted and they are currently in prison.